BY Elsa Imdad
The U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, marred by strategic failures and hasty decisions, left both
American credibility and Afghanistan in shambles.
Over three years, House Foreign Affairs Committee Republicans, led by Chairman Michael
McCaul, conducted a comprehensive investigation into the U.S. withdrawal from
Afghanistan. The investigation aimed to assess the Biden-Harris Administration’s planning,
decision-making, and execution of the withdrawal. The committee’s findings highlight
significant failures and missteps, leading to chaos and severe repercussions for U.S. national
security and credibility.
Key Findings of the Investigation
The investigation revealed five primary conclusions:
- Determination to Withdraw at Any Cost: The Biden-Harris administration was
determined to withdraw from Afghanistan, regardless of the Doha Agreement or the
evolving conditions on the ground. They disregarded the agreement’s stipulations, the
Afghan government’s pleas, and objections from NATO allies, choosing to proceed
unilaterally with the withdrawal. - Focus on Optics Over Security: The administration prioritized the optics of the
withdrawal over the safety of U.S. personnel, failing to plan for all contingencies,
including a noncombatant emergency evacuation (NEO). The delay in ordering a
NEO until after the Taliban had entered Kabul led to a chaotic and unsafe
environment. - Unsafe Environment and Casualties: The failure to prepare and execute a timely
NEO created an unsafe environment at Hamid Karzai International Airport (HKIA),
exposing U.S. personnel to significant threats. This negligence culminated in a
terrorist attack on August 26, 2021, killing 13 U.S. service members—the deadliest
day for the U.S. military in Afghanistan since 2012. - Degraded U.S. National Security: The withdrawal led to a degradation of U.S.
national security, as Afghanistan once again became a haven for terrorist
organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS-K. America’s credibility suffered greatly on the
global stage, especially after abandoning Afghan allies to Taliban reprisals. The moral
injury to American veterans and those still serving remains a profound impact on this
administration’s legacy. - Misinformation and Lack of Transparency: The Biden-Harris administration
misled and, in some cases, directly lied to the American people at every stage of the
withdrawal. The investigation indicates a coordinated misinformation campaign led
by the National Security Council and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, from
before the withdrawal order was given until the present day.
Decision to Withdraw
President Biden’s decision to withdraw was influenced by his belief that the U.S. should end
its involvement in Afghanistan, regardless of conditions or advice from military and
diplomatic advisors. Despite warnings that the Taliban were violating the Doha
Agreement—by maintaining ties with terrorist organizations and increasing violence—the
administration proceeded with the withdrawal, dismissing concerns from key U.S. allies and
national security experts.
Planning Failures and Unpreparedness
The report details significant planning failures, including a lack of contingency planning for a
NEO. The decision to keep the U.S. Embassy in Kabul open until the last moment, despite
deteriorating conditions, led to a chaotic evacuation. The administration failed to adequately
assess the potential evacuation population or prepare for a worst-case scenario, resulting in
the abandonment of many American citizens and Afghan allies.
Chaos and Casualties
The lack of preparedness led to confusion and chaos at Kabul’s airport. The failure to
establish clear guidelines on evacuation eligibility left Americans and Afghans vulnerable at
Taliban checkpoints, leading to the tragic Abbey Gate attack on August 26, 2021. This attack,
carried out by ISIS-K, resulted in the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and over 170
Afghan civilians.
Consequences of the Withdrawal
The withdrawal’s aftermath saw a rapid deterioration of security in Afghanistan, which
became a safe haven for terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS-K. The Taliban’s
takeover has led to severe human rights violations, especially against women and former
government officials. U.S. credibility suffered globally, damaging alliances and undermining
trust.
Recommendations
To prevent similar outcomes in future conflicts or withdrawals, the committee offers several
recommendations:
- Comprehensive After-Action Reviews: Conduct thorough and transparent reviews
of the entire withdrawal process, including decision-making, execution, and
communication failures. These reviews should involve all relevant stakeholders,
including military leaders, diplomats, intelligence officials, and allied partners, to
ensure a complete understanding of what went wrong and how similar failures can be
avoided in the future. - Enhanced Contingency Planning: Develop robust contingency plans for future
military withdrawals and crisis scenarios, including noncombatant evacuation
operations (NEOs). These plans should account for a wide range of potential outcomes, including the rapid collapse of local governments, the need for rapid evacuations, and the protection of both American personnel and local allies. - Improved Interagency Coordination: Strengthen interagency coordination and
communication among the Department of Defense, Department of State, National
Security Council, and allied governments to ensure unified and coherent strategies.
This should include regular scenario-based drills and exercises to prepare for worst-
case scenarios and foster better decision-making under crisis conditions. - Transparent Communication with the Public and Allies: Improve transparency
and communication with the American public and international allies, particularly
when making decisions that have significant geopolitical consequences. Ensuring that
the reasons for such decisions, as well as their risks and potential outcomes, are
communicated clearly can help maintain trust and credibility. - Strengthening Alliances and Partnerships: Engage in diplomatic efforts to rebuild
and strengthen alliances that may have been strained by the withdrawal. Reaffirm
commitments to partners in the region, ensuring that they are consulted and involved
in any future U.S. policy decisions that impact regional stability. - Investment in Counterterrorism Capabilities: Given the renewed threat of
Afghanistan becoming a terrorist safe haven, increase investment in intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities in the region. Enhance
partnerships with local and international forces to monitor and counter emerging
terrorist threats, ensuring that the U.S. retains the ability to respond swiftly to any
resurgence of groups like al-Qaeda or ISIS-K. - Support for Afghan Allies: Establish clear and efficient processes for providing
asylum or safe passage to Afghan allies who worked with U.S. forces, diplomats, and
aid organizations. Streamline the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) process and ensure
sufficient resources are allocated to handle applications swiftly. - Focus on Human Rights and Humanitarian Assistance: Continue to advocate for
human rights in Afghanistan, particularly for women and minorities, and provide
humanitarian aid to those affected by the Taliban’s rule. Collaborate with international
organizations to ensure that aid reaches those in need and that human rights abuses are
documented and addressed.
Critical Analysis and Conclusion
The investigation by the House Foreign Affairs Committee highlights how the U.S.
withdrawal from Afghanistan not only exposed critical flaws in American strategy but also
left Afghanistan in a precarious state. The abrupt exit, driven by a singular focus on
withdrawal, ignored the evolving realities on the ground, leading to a power vacuum that the
Taliban quickly filled. The decision, hence, led to a rapid dismantling of nearly two decades
of progress.
The implications of this withdrawal extend far beyond Afghanistan’s borders. This departure
emboldened extremist groups globally, sending a message that long-standing commitments
can be abandoned, leaving allies and partners questioning the reliability of American support.
The chaos that ensued at Kabul’s airport, culminating in the tragic loss of lives, serves as a
grim reminder of the human cost of poor planning and mismanagement.
Moreover, the failure to secure a responsible exit has had dire consequences for Afghan
society, particularly for women and minorities who now face a future of oppression and
violence. The rollback of human rights and the silencing of civil society voices mark a
significant regression in Afghanistan’s progress toward a more inclusive and democratic state.
Critically, the U.S. must reflect on the lessons learned from this debacle. The need for
comprehensive after-action reviews, enhanced contingency planning, and improved
interagency coordination is paramount to prevent similar failures in future conflicts.
Furthermore, rebuilding alliances and reaffirming commitments to human rights,
counterterrorism efforts, and assistance to Afghanistan—as well as to its neighbours like
Pakistan, which remain significantly affected by this massive and cursory change—are
essential steps to restore trust and mitigate the long-term damage caused by this withdrawal.
Ultimately, the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan serves as a cautionary tale of the
consequences of prioritizing political expediency over strategic foresight and humanitarian
responsibility. The path forward must involve not only addressing the immediate fallout but
also committing to a more thoughtful and principled approach to global engagement,
ensuring that such a costly exit is never repeated.
Reference: https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/WILLFULL-
BLINDNESS-An-Assessment-of-the-Biden-Harris%20Administrations-Withdrawal-from-
Afghanistan-and-the-Chaos-that-Followed.pdf
AUTHOR
Elsa Imdad is a USG Alumna. She holds a bachelors in modern languages with an English major and Spanish minor. She has previously been part of American Spaces in Pakistan and now works as a Project Coordinator at the Center for Research and Security Studies. She is also a weekly contributor for Matrix. Her interests include public diplomacy, language teaching, peace and conflict resolution, capacity building for marginalized groups, etc.
